Okay, so if you are playing chess for some time then you probably know about the stalemate. It is really frustrating when you are about to win but then, suddenly the game ends in a draw by stalemate. So, why is stalemate a draw?
A chess game is won if the opponent’s king is checkmated. However, in a stalemate, the opponent’s king doesn’t get checkmated because it is a condition in which the king is not in check and the player has no legal moves to continue the game. Hence, a stalemate is a draw.
I have talked about all these in detail, in my article about how many ways you can win chess.
But stalemate is a condition in which neither of these things happen. So we do not consider it as a win.
Let’s dive in deeper and see what was stalemate thought to be historically and also should we consider it as win.
Table of Contents
Historical facts about the stalemate
In the past, a stalemate was not considered a draw.
In historical forms of chess such as chaturanga, a stalemate was rather considered as a win by the side administering it.
And this practice continued for a long time but later it was started to be considered as an inferior win.
Finally, in the 19th-century, the stalemate was standardized as a draw. Now although it is standardized as a draw, periodically many players claim that the main reason for so many draws in chess is this stalemate only.
So the question comes, should the stalemate be considered as a win for the side causing it.
Should stalemate be a win?
This is a very debatable topic in the chess community. Some consider it should be a win while others don’t. For example, Grandmaster Larry Kaufman considers stalemate as a draw totally illogical. Whereas Grandmaster Larry Evans considers that the proposal to make a stalemate a win for the stalemating player would radically alter centuries of tradition and make chess boring.
On the Wikipedia page of stalemate, under the proposed rule change, you can find their statements.
Now coming to my opinion, I think stalemate should not be a win because it is already standardized so changing the rule will create many problems.
If stalemate would be a win, then several endgames in which, up till now we considered stalemate as a draw will result in a loss for the side getting stalemated.
Moreover, stalemate makes the game more challenging and interesting to play.
It forces the player to remain attentive until the game ends and also gives hope to a losing player from not resigning early.
Many arguments have been given for this and from my perspective, I feel that stalemate should not be considered as a win.
The rule should remain as it is since it is the same for all of us.
We should rather ask ourselves to focus during the game to avoid it and accept it as a challenge. Ultimately the challenges in a game only make it interesting. Right?
Why is stalemate not checkmate?
In checkmate, the player’s king is in threat and the player has no legal moves to take that king out of it. However, in stalemate, the king is not in threat (because the king is not in check) and so a stalemate is not checkmate. To understand this see the below examples.
- Here the black king is not in check.
- Although the white queen is attacking but still the square where the king is standing is totally safe.
- And the black player has no legal moves left which he/she can make.
- This is because the black king is in a locked position and there are no other pieces on the board.
- Therefore this is the condition of stalemate and the game ends in a draw.
- Here the black king is in check.
- The white queen is attacking the black king and also the white rook as you can see.
- There are no ways by which the black king can be saved from the threat.
- Hence this is the condition of the checkmate.
So from the above two examples it is very clear why stalemate is not checkmate.
Related articles on stalemate
That’s it! I hope you find this article interesting. If it was helpful then please do consider sharing it with others.
And before you go, if you are interested to learn more about the stalemate then I highly recommend you to check out my articles.